Text:

Creative Strategies Building the Common

Amanda de la Garza, Alejandra Labastida, Ignacio Plá

Mexico-MUAC.pdf web

Text from the publi­ca­ti­on of the solo exhi­bi­ti­on “Conquering and Constructing the Common”, MUAC, Mexico City, 2013.

Andreja Kulunčić’s artis­tic prac­ti­ce is cha­rac­te­ri­zed by the explo­ra­ti­on of new models of soci­al rela­ti­ons and com­mu­ni­ca­ti­on. Kulunčić under­stan­ds art as a pro­cess of rese­ar­ch, col­la­bo­ra­ti­on and self-orga­ni­za­ti­on. This exhi­bi­ti­on is part of a bro­ader pro­ject, enti­tled Creative Strategies, which seeks to deve­lop a tran­sdis­ci­pli­nary plat­form for under­stan­ding, exc­han­ging, and pro­du­cing cre­ati­ve com­mu­nity stra­te­gi­es. Each modu­le of this inves­ti­ga­ti­on, begun in Croatia, focu­ses onac­ti­va­ting ini­ti­ati­ves of self-orga­ni­za­ti­on in the real fabric of soci­ety. Kulunčić’s inte­rest in the­se subjec­ts sho­uld be under­sto­od in rela­ti­on to the his­to­ri­cal and geopo­li­ti­cal con­text of her gaze: Croatia was part of the for­mer Yugoslavia, a soci­alist coun­try in which the idea of com­mu­nity was ide­olo­gi­cal­ly impo­sed by the regime.

Conquering and Building the Common began during an artis­t’s resi­den­cy in Mexico City in 2011. During her stay she conve­ned a wor­king gro­up with rese­ar­c­hers from the Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana (UAM), the Colegio de México, the Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM) and repre­sen­ta­ti­ves from four com­mu­nity orga­ni­za­ti­ons in the city:

 

In the first pha­se of rese­ar­ch, the wor­king gro­up focu­sed on trac­king the his­tory of self-orga­ni­za­ti­on in the city and inves­ti­ga­ting the stra­te­gi­es used to resol­ve pro­blems of everyday life in mar­gi­nal urban con­texts. One of the dis­co­ve­ri­es of this pro­cess was the need to arti­cu­la­te a his­tory of soci­al orga­ni­za­ti­on in Mexico, con­fron­ting the offi­ci­al ver­si­on, and writ­ten from its own expe­ri­en­ce. Likewise, a wide ran­ge of ini­ti­ati­ves was iden­ti­fi­ed in which soci­al cre­ati­vity is made mani­fest as a tool that has been tran­s­la­ted into pro­ce­sses of iden­tity cons­ti­tu­ti­on and vali­da­ti­on, and into pro­jec­ts such as urban gar­dens, com­mu­nity libra­ri­es and kit­c­hens, art and tra­de scho­ols, popu­lar housing and the pro­vi­si­on of urban ser­vi­ces, among other thin­gs. In its second sta­ge in 2013, a new wor­king gro­up made up of repre­sen­ta­ti­ves of the asso­ci­ati­ons and invi­ted artis­ts was able to iden­tify a seri­es of pro­blems that the orga­ni­za­ti­ons have con­fron­ted over the cour­se of the­ir his­to­ri­es, from for­ma­ti­on thro­ugh con­so­li­da­ti­on (inter­nal divi­si­ve­ness and cor­rup­ti­on, ins­tru­men­ta­li­za­ti­on as poli­ti­cal capi­tal by poli­ti­cal par­ti­es, etc.).

Kulunčić’s exhi­bi­ti­on con­ta­ins a video ins­tal­la­ti­on that pre­sents the public with her rese­ar­ch mate­ri­als and a pro­gram of acti­vi­ti­es con­ce­ived in col­la­bo­ra­ti­on with the soci­al organizations.

The prin­ci­pal objec­ti­ve of the pro­ject is to pro­du­ce a plat­form for sha­ring the expe­ri­en­ce and knowled­ges that have been cons­truc­ted, which would allow for futu­re col­la­bo­ra­ti­on betwe­en the­se ini­ti­ati­ves and lead to the cre­ati­on of a manu­al or “tool box,” made on the basis of orga­ni­zing expe­ri­en­ces, and which may pro­ve use­ful for other collectivities.

Parallel to the exhi­bi­ti­on, the­re will be a chan­nel of com­mu­ni­ca­ti­on with a wider public thro­ugh news­pa­per inserts and a web­pa­ge that will fun­c­ti­on as a data­ba­se abo­ut soci­al orga­ni­za­ti­ons in Mexico City.

Although Kulunčić’s work could be ins­cri­bed wit­hin what some aut­hors have dub­bed the “soci­al turn” in art, the artist dis­tan­ces her­self from dif­fe­rent lines deve­lo­ped under this heading. By con­trast to rela­ti­onal aes­t­he­tics, for exam­ple, her pro­ject is not a mat­ter of sim­ply repro­du­cing for­ms of soci­abi­lity in the spa­ce of the muse­um, out of a field of acti­on whol­ly deter­mi­ned by the artist and the codes of art. Rather, the pro­ject assu­mes a cri­ti­cal pos­tu­re toward the uses that have been made of actors, the­mes, and soci­al con­texts in such artis­tic practice.
The pro­po­sal being pre­sen­ted at the MUAC is advan­ced as a plat­form in two sen­ses. is cle­ar abo­ut the risk of a work that tri­es to exist in two wor­l­ds that play by dif­fe­rent sets of rules. Her balan­cing act con­sis­ts of insu­ring that her wor­ld will not neutra­li­ze that of the other. On the one hand, this faci­li­ta­tes the use of the muse­um, under­sto­od as a pri­vi­le­ged pla­ce of visi­bi­lity that exter­nal actors are able to use. At the same time, howe­ver, this gene­ra­tes a seri­es of viral mec­ha­ni­sms-inter­ven­ti­ons in public spa­ce and in the mass media-with the aim of rein­ser­ting the deman­ds and actors that are tem­po­ra­rily insi­de the muse­um back into the public set­ting and making use of artis­tic lan­gu­age. The key to the ope­ra­ti­on is cre­ating con­di­ti­ons of equ­ality of enun­ci­ati­on for all actors.

The subjec­ts who have col­la­bo­ra­ted on the pro­ject par­ti­ci­pa­te acti­vely in making deci­si­ons abo­ut the direc­ti­on in which it has been moving. The artist has defi­ned the for­mal solu­ti­on of the work in the exhi­bi­ti­on hall; the­re is no hypo­cri­ti­cal attempt to pre­sent her role as somet­hing other than what it is. It fun­c­ti­ons as an appa­ra­tus, a con­ta­iner in which people can find each other, a pat­hway along which to chan­nel the­se soci­al ener­gi­es, but many of the deci­si­ons abo­ut the pro­ject have been made col­lec­ti­vely, from the acti­vi­ti­es that will be deve­lo­ped in this appa­ra­tus and the design of the web­pa­ge to the very title of the pro­ject. Although it is impo­ssi­ble to safe­gu­ard a pro­ject com­ple­tely from ins­tru­men­ta­li­za­ti­on in the com­pli­ca­ted mesh of poli­ti­cal and eco­no­mic for­ces that tra­ver­se the ins­ti­tu­ti­on of the muse­um, Kulunčić is assu­red that this ins­tru­men­ta­li­za­ti­on will at least be mutual.

Kulunčić’s work shows self-orga­ni­za­ti­on to be an essen­ti­al part of urban expe­ri­en­ce and his­tory. Furthermore, she echo­es what the orga­ni­za­ti­ons’ expe­ri­en­ce pro­du­ces: the idea of com­mu­nity and of the “com­mon good” is not a given, but rat­her somet­hing that is cons­truc­ted and-to use the­ir own ter­ms-conqu­ered, inso­far as it acts to oppo­se the soci­al logics and logics of subjec­ti­fi­ca­ti­on pre­va­lent in capitalism.

Mexico City, 2013

, ,